Tools built for real workflows
Free tools for AI agents and crypto
Practical tools for people working with AI agents and crypto. Start with a useful check, inspect the evidence, and decide what to do next.
{
"id": "sample-02",
"instrument": "ETH-USD",
"side": "sell",
"evidence": [],
"estimated_fee_usd": null
}
// findings from the local check status = "review" findings = 4 // missing evidence, missing costs, // no approval record ...
Featured / new launch
Trend Join Long, built with Claude Code: a bot that scans the S&P 500 for gappers, checks six filters every 5 minutes, buys with a broker-held stop and manages the exit on its own, on a configured Interactive Brokers paper or live account.
14 Claude Code prompts, every bug we fixed, a free PDF and an assistant for build questions. Paper testing recommended before live use; not financial advice.
Community-first releases. Each one does one useful job, says what it checks, and says what it does not.
Turn scattered crypto updates into a brief you can audit. Collect official project updates, draft with your own chat assistant, and get a local report that makes missing sources and claims needing human review visible.
Get the kit ↗Check known request incompatibilities before moving a Claude agent to Opus 5.5. Generate a local report, with optional live tests using your own API key.
Get the free kit ↗Inspect a trading agent's proposed action, supporting evidence, costs, and approval trail in a browser-based review. Upload a JSON log or start with the sample; analysis stays in your browser.
Open the free lab ↗No tools match that search. Try another term.
The trade review lab does not connect to an exchange or place trades. The upgrade kit's example responses are simulated; live API use is optional and may incur charges. The research kit's example is historical, its checks are structural, and every claim still needs human verification; it gives no trading signals or investment advice.
Every decision an agent proposes leaves a record. The lab reads that record and tells you what is missing before you rely on it.
Is the instrument, side and size stated, and does the record cite what the agent relied on?
Are estimated fees and slippage recorded, so the cost of acting is visible before the decision is judged?
Was the action approved by someone, and did approval come before execution?
A clear review means the fields are present. It does not mean a trade is good or safe.
Start with the sample. No account, no upload to a server, no trade.